FNGU vs TQQQ — ETF Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+ 3 Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) differ in expense ratio (2.60% vs 0.97%) and AUM ($2.66B vs $35.29B). Here's how they compare across all key metrics.
Performance Comparison
Quick Verdict
TQQQ wins on 6 out of 9 metrics. TQQQ has a lower expense ratio (0.97%). TQQQ has higher AUM ($35.29B).
Basic Information
Metric
FNGU
TQQQ
Fund Name
MicroSectors FANG+ 3 Leveraged ETNs
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
Issuer
MicroSectors
ProShares
Inception Date
Feb 23, 2025
Feb 9, 2010
Expense Ratio
2.60%
0.97%
AUM
$2.66B
$35.29B
Holdings Count
(n/a)
123
Current Price
$31.18
$69.99
Today's Change
-0.10%
-0.43%
Dividend Yield
(n/a)
1.11%
Performance Comparison
Period
FNGU
TQQQ
1M
+23.63%
+10.39%
3M
-5.17%
-16.36%
6M
+69.55%
+41.34%
YTD
+29.22%
+33.70%
1Y
+23.88%
+54.45%
3Y
-80.98%
+259.94%
5Y
-91.46%
+92.94%
Top Holdings
5 overlapping holdings in top 10
FNGU Holdings
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
11.58%AVGOBroadcom Inc.
11.12%MSFTMicrosoft Corporation
10.53%METAMeta Platforms, Inc.
10.33%GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
10.32%AAPLApple Inc.
9.94%AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
9.60%NFLXNetflix, Inc.
9.12%NOWServiceNow, Inc.
8.74%CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
8.72%TQQQ Holdings
Net Other Assets (Liabilities)
24.79%TREASURY BILL
18.36%IQMMPROSHARES GENIUS MNY MKT ETF
17.96%NVDANVIDIA CORP
3.28%AAPLAPPLE INC
2.86%MSFTMICROSOFT CORP
2.24%MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
1.90%AMZNAMAZON.COM INC
1.75%AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
1.32%GOOGLALPHABET INC-CL A
1.24%Sector Allocation
FNGU Sectors
Technology60.63%
Communication Services29.77%
Consumer Cyclical9.60%
TQQQ Sectors
Technology57.94%
Communication Services13.56%
Consumer Cyclical11.21%
Consumer Defensive6.66%
Industrials3.85%
Healthcare3.80%
Utilities1.19%
Basic Materials1.01%
Energy0.54%
Financial Services0.23%
Cash & Others0.01%
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons
More TQQQ Comparisons
FREE DOWNLOAD
The Beginner's Guide to ETFs
20 pages. Zero fluff. Everything you need to start investing in ETFs.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.